Africa Eu Partnership

Programme Recorded · 2014–2020

Pan-African Programme

A guide to a historical funding framework designed to support continental and cross-regional cooperation in shared policy areas.

Recorded context: This programme period concluded in 2020. The page describes its original scope and recorded projects; it is not a current funding call.
Detailed map used to plan connections across regions

The programme was built around initiatives whose intended value extended beyond a single country or region.

What the programme was

The historical record below separates the programme’s stated objectives from present-day funding arrangements.

Established in 2014, the Pan-African Programme was a financial instrument supporting implementation of the Joint Africa–Europe strategy. It was designed for projects with cross-regional, continental or global relevance in areas of shared interest.

The first phase covered 2014–2017. Its cooperation areas included peace and security; democratic governance and rights; human development; sustainable and inclusive growth; continental integration; and global or cross-cutting issues. The framework continued through a second phase for 2018–2020.

During that second phase, the programme grouped activity under three broad headings: political dialogue and pan-African governance; education, skills, research and technology; and continental economic integration.

For the underlying historical framework, consult the archived joint strategy document and the 2014–2017 roadmap.

Second-phase priorities

The 2018–2020 phase concentrated the programme’s recorded activity in three areas.

01

Continental economic integration

Resilient infrastructure, integrated markets, trade links, policy coordination and the conditions supporting responsible investment.

02

Investing in people

Job-oriented learning, higher education, academic mobility, research capacity, technology and recognition of skills.

03

Dialogue and governance

Political dialogue, institutional engagement and accountable, responsive governance at a pan-African level.

Selection logic

How added value was framed

The programme’s rationale rested on three tests. These help explain why certain initiatives appeared in a continent-wide instrument rather than a country programme.

Scale beyond one region

Projects were expected to have a cross-regional, continental or global dimension in subjects such as agriculture, environment, higher education, digital systems and research.

Shared strategic interest

Activities needed a clear connection to priorities considered relevant on both continents.

Complementary financing

The instrument was intended to work alongside other geographic and thematic funding channels rather than duplicate them.

Projects in the archive

Examples retained from the original programme page. Inclusion records historical association, not current operational status.

Integration and connectivity

View all in this area →

Education, research and skills

View all in this area →

Governance and institutional support

View all in this area →

Recorded reading list

Programme announcements and documents should be read with their original dates and institutional setting in view.

Programme questions

Concise answers for readers using this historical overview.

Is the Pan-African Programme still open?

This page covers the 2014–2020 programme period and should not be read as a current call for proposals. Consult the relevant issuing institutions for present funding arrangements.

What made a project pan-African?

The framework emphasised activity with cross-regional, continental or global relevance rather than work limited to one national setting.

Which priorities applied in 2018–2020?

The second phase focused on continental economic integration; education, skills, research and technology; and political dialogue with pan-African governance.

Was every listed project active for the full period?

Not necessarily. The listings record association with programme themes. Individual project pages should be checked for their own dates, scope and status.

How should the financial figures be interpreted?

They are historical programme allocations and commitments stated for specific periods. They are not current prices, offers or available balances.

Where can I report A recorded error?

Send the page title, the disputed detail and supporting evidence to the editorial contact in the footer.