Case-study archive
Four historical case studies examine renewable energy, climate resilience, research connectivity and support for peace and public institutions.
The collection connects programme aims with their original dates, scope and implementation setting.
These summaries retain the substance of earlier programme records while making their historical status and limitations clear.
The projects below began or operated in earlier periods. Figures and institutional arrangements belong to their source records and should not be treated as current totals or present-day programme status. Open each linked PDF for the archived case study.
Renewable energy
Renewable Energy Cooperation Programme
Launched in 2011, this long-term programme addressed market barriers, professional training and cooperation around renewable-energy investment. The archived source records an €11 million budget at the time of publication.
Read archived case study →
Climate resilience
Great Green Wall initiative for the Sahara and Sahel
Initiated by African leaders in 2007, the wider effort promoted sustainable management of natural resources in arid regions. This case study focuses on a 2011–2013 project that supported participating institutions and countries.
Read archived case study →
Peace and institutions
Historical support to the African-led mission in Somalia
The archived record describes financial assistance following the mission’s 2007 deployment. Support was intended to help fulfil an international mandate as one element of broader engagement in Somalia and the surrounding region.
Read archived case study →
Research connectivity
AfricaConnect project
The 2011–2015 project worked on high-capacity internet links for research and education in Eastern and Southern Africa, connecting national and regional networks with the wider research community.
Read archived case study →What is included
Every entry separates documented programme information from present-day interpretation.
Launch and implementation periods remain visible so older activity is not mistaken for current work.
Each summary identifies the practical issue the project intended to address.
Descriptions explain the participating systems without implying current endorsement.
The linked PDF allows readers to inspect the full archived case study and its original framing.
Editorial method
Recorded entries are concise, dated and careful about the distinction between programme aims and verified outcomes.
Establish the project, subject, timeframe and type of source material.
Summarise the documented purpose without repeating promotional wording.
Mark historical figures and arrangements so they are not read as current facts.
Keep the source document available for readers who need fuller context.
Guidance for interpreting older programme case studies and their source documents.
Not necessarily. The entries describe historical records, and the dates shown in each summary indicate the period covered. Consult current issuing institutions for present programme status.
No. Any amount mentioned is tied to the archived document and its publication context. It is not a current budget or cumulative total.
No. It is the archive’s original category for programme case studies. The summaries describe documented aims and activity without independently asserting complete success.
They preserve details about scope, terminology and programme design that cannot fit into a short editorial summary.
The featured records cover renewable energy, climate and land resilience, research connectivity, and support for peace and public institutions.
Use the “More success stories” link above to browse the wider archive.